Enlightened vs. Evil

Societies are broken down into the evil, about two percent, the enlightened, about 13%, and the mindless masses, about 85%. The evil element constantly battles the enlightened element of society for the loyalty of the mindless masses. Although smaller in numbers, the evil element has the advantage. The evil element is closer in nature to the masses. It represents the fears and selfish desires most dominant among members of the masses. Only when evil discredits itself horribly or causes excessive injury to society can the enlightened become an appealing alternative for the masses.

Currently, the U.S. is at one of these crossroads. The nation is in the hands of evil rulers. The Republican Party is its Sheriff of Nottingham. The Democrats, however, are not Robin Hood. The Democrats are an illusion of an alternative, of a separate form of government. The Democrats also are servants of the rulers, the evil segment, not the enlightened element nor the mindless masses. This condition is what Francis Fukuyama praised in his book “The End of History.” There is no alternative,” he argued. This is the glue that best holds society together. It is the formula that combines society’s animal and human natures into a functioning, stable nation and region. It does not meet most enlightened ideals, but it does seem to be the most practical for the stage of evolution humans now occupy, the Neo-Conservatives believe. The enlightened element believes the majority of the masses can become enlightened if it has the correct information and the brain is functioining in a healthy manner.